Back

MINUTES

WASHINGTON STATE JAIL INDUSTRIES BOARD MEETING

February 8,2002

10:00 AM–2:00 PM

Administration Conference Room

King County Regional Justice Center

Kent, Washington



Board Members Attending: Proxies Presented: Guests Attending: Welcome New Board Member Kenneth Kunes A. Quorem Check B. Election of Officers
Approval of the Minutes, October 26, 2001 Meeting D. Executive Director's Report
OLD BUSINESS
E. Apprenticeship Information Pilot Project Report Julie Ann Beck was present as a volunteer to provide the Performance Measures Outcome Report on the Apprenticeship Information Pilot Project. Results of the project are extremely encouraging. The key performance measure of the number of apprentices indentured is a 13, 163% of the target. Additional apprentices will be indentured as an outcome of the project in several trades. The project ran its scheduled term from January 1-December 31, 2001. The project is now suspended pending receipt of additional funding.

Julie Ann Beck noted that the Apprenticeship Information Pilot Project may be presented before the national building and construction trades legislative conference held by the AFL-CIO. This organization will be investigated as a possible funding source.

F. Clark County Update

Mike Anderson, Facility Commander of the Clark County Jail Work Center, gave a brief overview of operations there. The facility, which opened approximately two years ago, has both work release and in-custody work activities. On-site work includes grounds crews, a full service laundry; and a food services program which serves the work center, the main jail, and the juvenile detention facility. The program turns out 2400 meals per day with a $0.60 per meal raw food cost. The food services manager is a registered Dietician and a food services teacher who is looking into certificate programs in food service for inmate workers. This would be a useful credential for use upon release.

Mr. Anderson also provided information on the Padden Expressway Project and cited it as a good example of cost-effective use of inmate labor. The Padden Expressway is a major highway construction project. Inmates from the Work Center salvaged native plants from the construction site that will be held at the Work Center and replanted upon completion of construction. This will save the county a significant number of landscaping dollars.

Other worthy projects at the Work Center include: a joint project with the neighboring Clark Public Utilities generation plant which will allow use of water for an irrigation project; laundering, repair, and ultimate donation to charity of "lost and found" clothing held by the school district; and expansion of the Prison Fellowship Program, aimed at enhancing post-release services for ex-offenders.

Board members and guests suggested gathering comparative statistics on recidivism rates for program participants versus the general population. Such data would be very helpful in ensuring ongoing support. Clark County does not yet have such information available, as it is still in the process of developing partnerships with community organizations.

Mike Anderson acknowledged Dennis Graham for his good work on private sector business recruiting. Mr. Graham then provided an overview of marketing materials, copies of the Vancouver Chamber newsletter featuring information about the project, and copies of full-page spreads in the Columbian business section and the Vancouver Business Journal resulting from press releases. He also discussed a round of editorials and the coverage generated which features pro and con views on inmate labor.

Mr. Graham stated that most of the feedback from potential business partners has been generated by the direct mail brochures. News articles have generated some interest. In addition to the advertising based marketing campaign, Mr. Graham is active at Chamber functions, is addressing service clubs, and taking every opportunity to do "network marketing", such as hosting a Rotary Club luncheon and looking for potential leads when business people conduct unrelated business with the county. The partner who expressed the strongest interest to date does not fit with the timeline to fill the space as soon as possible. Nevertheless, the potential partner was very interested in the immediately available labor force.

Bruce Thompson complemented Dennis Graham for the quality of his work.

NEW BUSINESS

G. Budget Process for 2003-2005 Biennium
Jill Will provided an overview of the State agency budget process. The planning phase for developing the State budget for the 2003-2005 biennium has already begun. Detailed budget instructions for Phase II of the process will be issued in April. The Office of Financial Management wants some preliminary budget information submitted by May 1, 2002. Final submittals are due to the Governor's office in late summer.

Board direction is required on the following item's:

1. Identify the level of funding for the biennial budget request.
2. Decide with which agency to make the budget request.


Ms. Will summarized the Board's funding history. The Jail Industries Board (JIB) was authorized by legislation in 1993 with no funding provided. No funding was provided in Fiscal Years(FY) 1994 or 1995. A supplement budget request made in January 1996 for $100,000 was granted for FY 97. The Board was re-funded at $100,000 per fiscal year for the period FY 98-FY 2001. A very modest funding increase for FY 02-03 was denied by the Governor's office. The annual appropriation was increased to $110,000 per year for FY 2002 and FY 2003 by the Legislation in recognition of the fact that no provisions had been made to increase the Boards funds to cover mandatory additional spending such as salary increases during the preceding five years.

JIB does not have its own line item appropriation, although the money for Board operations is built in the current authorized level of the Department of Corrections, Division of Correctional Industries budget. This funding is then subject to a "proviso" added to the budget bill by the Legislature. The proviso is specific direction to an agency receiving money on how that money is to be spent. The proviso language for ;the original and continuing appropriations were gained by working with legislative budget committee members (especially Chairs and Vice Chairs) and staff to insert desired language into the budget bill.

Extensive discussion followed about the funding options available to the Board. These options include remaining in the Correctional Industries portion of the budget; requesting funding in another portion of the Department of Corrections (DOC) Budget; and requesting funding in another State agency budget. Given the serious budget problems now facing the State, and little prospect of significant increases in revenues, the Jail Industries Board is in a very vulnerable funding position. Governmental staff members polled suggested that caution was in order and that as little change as possible was the most prudent course. The Board directed the following action be taken:

BUDGET ACTION ITEMS:
Jill Will and Marvin Wolff